Blogstream   -   Create a Blog!   -   Login Chat   -   Options   -   Clean   -   Flag   -   Family Filter: Off   -   Recent   -   Rndm >>    

Blogstream  >  Anything  >  Blog  >  Post #339858
 
We have met the enemy and he is us


 Voting checkoff list.
Back to Full Blog  

The Peever had a posting about “single issue” voters. Prompted me to get started on updating my checkoff list for the election.

In a sense I guess I am a “single issue” voter. Certainly not abortion or gay marriage or something idiotic like that. My single issue is the economy.

A couple of comments to begin with. Will rogers said all men look good until they are elected and that Congress' greatest contribution is to get the 500 biggest liars in the country in the same place. You know how to tell when a politician is lying? His mouth moves. Obama was on GMA this morning and very unartfully avoided the question.

Some sub issues about the economy and how the candidates look to me (based largely on their websites).

The National Debt. McCain wants to reform the Federal bureaucracy and keep taxes low. Obama wants a “jumpstart” and tax relief. But taxes are a separate category. A lot of this is fighting Congress' corruption and the Iraq and Afghanistan Wars. Close but Obama gets the check on this one.

The War. We should not have ever gotten into it. But we are in it and it must be ended correctly. A terrible drain on the economy. Sue Bush for the costs of the war. But an economic draw between McCain and Obama. Too much smoke screen and flipflopping.

The dollar. A lot of this to my mind is the national Debt and what them furriners think of us 'Murrikins. Bush is the international symbol for evil and McCain will not be able to turn that around. Trade barriers, international business are hard to find out about. Obama gets a definite check.

Taxes. Complicated. A lot of smoke from both sides. Tend to go with the age old idea that Republicans go for smaller government and Democrats are tax and spend. McCain gets a tentative check.

Energy and gas. Like all of the ideas about off-shore drilling, alternative sources, alternative transportation, nuclear, oil company profits (lots of luck on that one), etc. Neither will go for higher gas taxes but I think that is the way to go. Pretty even between them. Maybe McCain.

The environment. This is a big economic issue. Cleaning stuff up is expensive. And dollars spent now will means lots less spent by my grandchildren. Obama's website has a list of things he promises to do. Sounds good before the election. Check for Obama.

Earmarks and Congressional corruption. Again, lots of smoke. These are politicians talking about their bread and butter, after all. Based on McCain's record in Congress, a definite check for him.

Summary: close but an edge for Obama.

Both of the websites are full of what they are going to do. Neither really tell how. Whatever the how is, it will cost us – a lot. My peronal economic plan will be a joke. And neither tell how they will get around a donothing, corrupt, political Congress.

And then there is this that showed up in my inbox this very morning: "A president's pension currently is $191,300 per year, until he is 80 years old. Assuming the next president would be Sen. McCain and he lives to age 80 at the end of two terms as president, he would receive ZERO pension. Sen. Obama would be retired for 26 years after two terms and would receive $4,973,800 in pension. Therefore it would certainly make economic sense to elect McCain in November."

Comments and additions welcomed.

Posted by sinann at 9:55 AM - 14 Comments   Add a Comment  
  Hide Post  
Next Post
 
Comments:

good post = I will not put my life in the hands of any politician and his or her hands. I am making my own plans and trusting God for the rest.

ron
 
|<   <<   >>   >|

 
by AZRON (PM , CC ) on Monday September 15, 2008 @ 10:00 AM




Boy, you are fast, Ron.

Do put my trust in God. But recognize that I and my brain are God's agents. Tend to sound negative when I analyze politics but really believe things are getting better. God IS in His Heaven and although things are not right in the world, He and we are making them better. Every day and every way, we are getting better, Sir. The road is rocky but we have the strength and ability.
 
|<   <<   >>   >|

 
by sinann (PM , CC ) on Monday September 15, 2008 @ 10:12 AM




sinann:

"Democrats are tax and spend."

Republicans are borrow and spend. Have you looked at the national debt recently? Compare it with the debt when Bush assumed office in 2001.

Look at the mess in the sub-prime mortgage industry created because Bush removed regulation of the industry. That is like an enormous tax increase on Americans.
 
|<   <<   >>   >|

 
by Whit's Whittlings (PM , CC ) on Monday September 15, 2008 @ 12:58 PM




Agree, Whit, so true, sadly, so true. The views of both candidates are so full of B.S. on this issue. And the economics of trickle down, Reaganomics, etc. is beyond me. I see the calculations on taxing the rich vs taxing the middle class and the "experts" have good arguments on both sides. Plus it all has to go through Pelosi's Congress. There will be so many loopholes no matter how it comes out. So I finally settled on what I said. Ask me in 50 years if I was right.  
|<   <<   >>   >|

 
by sinann (PM , CC ) on Monday September 15, 2008 @ 1:14 PM




My "single issue" is the reduction of government. Neither party seems too interested in doing this, though.

Ending our nation building campaign in the middle east as quickly as possible is up there, as well, but, again, I don't think either party is too interested.

I guess I'm a "subversive", which is funny, because my politics were pretty "main-stream" amongst the framers of the Constitution.

Go figure...

peace, wayf

 
|<   <<   >>   >|

 
by wayfarer (PM , CC ) on Monday September 15, 2008 @ 1:22 PM




There is a principle I read about somewhere, Wayfarer, could not find the name, about governmental offices expanding even though there is not a task for them to do. And then there is also the idea that when we do horrible stuff, the government has to police it. When there are accidents, they have to put a policeman on the corner.

Always thought that the Republicans were in favor of this but Bush's administrtion has expanded the size of the government horribly. Saw a statistic somewhere about that but could not retrieve it quickly. Our Founding Fathers would spank us and send us to time out, for sure.
 
|<   <<   >>   >|

 
by sinann (PM , CC ) on Monday September 15, 2008 @ 1:32 PM




sinann,
That's funny, but I'll give up the 5 million.
 
|<   <<   >>   >|

 
by The Peever (PM , CC ) on Monday September 15, 2008 @ 1:35 PM




Am the same age as McCain. Why discriminate against us geezers, I ask you?

How about the real checkoffs, Peeve? Which way do you go?
 
|<   <<   >>   >|

 
by sinann (PM , CC ) on Monday September 15, 2008 @ 3:29 PM




I'm facing life on a fixed income in the next year or so, Sinann. And don't want to find myself working the take out window at MacDonalds.

I should start out fine, but after politicians get get through with managing the economy, I'm worried what awaits me about 5 years down the pike!
 
|<   <<   >>   >|

 
by Anexplorer (PM , CC ) on Tuesday September 16, 2008 @ 6:34 PM




Followed all the rules for my fixed income retirement, Anexplorer. And it has not worked well. The rules did not take into account the big chunks that the stock market takes when it drops and that when a chunk is gone, the rebound is really slow. Nor did it predict the inflation rates. Be conservative.

And McDonald's is not so bad. Tutor.com was a life saver.

What would you change in my checkoff list?
 
|<   <<   >>   >|

 
by sinann (PM , CC ) on Wednesday September 17, 2008 @ 6:27 AM




sinann...I have to tell you that I sincerely appreciate this post. You have really done your research and you laid it out honestly and accurately. I fancy myself as a Democrat, but as I grow older...and as a friend pointed out recently, I'm actually probably more of a "Jeffersonian Republican". I'm not a liberal. I'm certainly not a Conservative. I found myself coming up on the fence between McCain and Obama.

I agree with you that the economy is issue #1 now. I agree with you that Obama has a marginally more sound vision of the economy. Although my personal idealogy tends to be closer to McCain's, I just believe that it would be irresponsible to support him as president. I came to the same conclusions as you. Looks like I'm in the Obama camp.

Thank you for the well thought out and independent post, my friend.

Kudos, T

 
|<   <<   >>   >|

 
by Biggie T (PM , CC ) on Thursday September 18, 2008 @ 1:07 AM




Your post is excellent, sinann and quite similar to my view of the upcoming election. The economy's at the top of my list of concerns. Over the years I've evolved into sort've a compassionate libertarian. The past two elections have offered me no candidates that I felt comfortable with. There was a time when I was impressed with McCain, but that was back in 2000 when he was running against Bush in the primaries. Now I find much of what he says is just untrue and frequently just pandering pablum, including his choice of Palin for VP. Obama makes me nervous. He's eloquent, brilliant and probably well-intentioned. Unfortunately I don't grasp a lot of substance in his proposed policies, but with McCain as the alternative, I don't have much choice. I'll place my bet on Obama and pray to the gods that I don't regret my decision. This country can't stand much more of what we've had for the past eight years.  
|<   <<   >>   >|

 
by Captain Morgan (PM , CC ) on Sunday September 21, 2008 @ 1:18 AM




Just returned, Biggie, after an extended vacation trip. thanks for the comment.

And returned to the news about the House and its vote. The economy certainly is number one. Shot off a note to my Representative, for sure.
 
|<   <<   >>   >|

 
by sinann (PM , CC ) on Tuesday September 30, 2008 @ 6:59 AM




Vowed to keep my decision rational, Cap'n. After the House's failure yesterday, think I will vote for the Bull Moose Party, however. Just sent my Congresswoman my thoughts.  
|<   <<   >>   >|

 
by sinann (PM , CC ) on Tuesday September 30, 2008 @ 7:18 AM


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   
  About Me
Author: sinann
From Virginia's Eastern Shore,
Age: 72
 
This blog is about...
Keep it between the navigational beacons.
 
My: Profile  Gallery  Interests  Bio  Guestbook 
 
Bookmark   History

  Blogstream Sponsors
Have you checked out the new Blogstream site,

Question Stream.com?

Many Blogstream members are there already! Quotes from members: "It's like blog lite!" -- "I like the instant gratification!" -- "Stop spectating, get in the game!"

If you have not joined in, you are really missing out!

Send Free
Just Saying Hi
Greeting Cards
at

Greeting Cards.com


Good Morning


  Recent Posts

  Blogs I Like

  Sites I Like

  Archives

5057 Visitors